R-TOC Home

DoD R-TOC Program

R-TOC Newsletters

DoD Value Engineering Program

CAIV and Evolutionary Acquisition

R-TOC Forums

Special Interest Programs

- SIP Forum Briefings

  • Aug 2006
  • May 2006
  • Feb 2006
  • Nov 2005
  • Feb 2004
  • - SIP Forum Minutes

  • May 2006
  • Feb 2006
  • Nov 2005
  • Feb 2004
  • Transformation through R-TOC

    Implementing R-TOC

    R-TOC Training and Information

    R-TOC Pilot Programs

    Lessons Learned

    R-TOC Best Practices

    Other R-TOC Items






    02142006

    i

    Guardrail Common Sensor

    Description

    The Weapon System

    The Guardrail/Common Sensor (GR/CS) is a corps-level, fixed-wing airborne signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection and target location system. The GR/CS system supports corps, division, and joint land force component commanders by detecting, identifying, exploiting, and precisely locating threat communications, radars, and other electronic emitters throughout the corps area of interest.

    The mission of the Guardrail/Common Sensor is to provide signals intercept and precision target location of threat communications and non-communications electronic emitters.

    Interoperable data links provide microwave connectivity between the aircraft and the integrated processing facility (IPF). The GR/CS provides near real-time SIGINT and targeting information to tactical commanders throughout the corps area via the Joint Tactical Terminal.

    The thrust of the Guardrail R-TOC initiative is to develop 1) a long-term sustainment/modernization program based on a systems perspective; and 2) implementation of performance-based agreements with the user, contractors, PM, CECOM, depots, and DLA. Expected benefits include: improved operational availability, reduced TOC, streamlined acquisition and sustainment, rapid new technology insertion, faster turnaround time for repairs, and greater visibility into failures and rapid redesign. The Guardrail approach is planned as a prototype for application to other low density, high demand (LD/HD) systems.

    In October 2000, Guardrail was one of four R-TOC Pilot Programs designated to experiment with performance agreements with users, performance agreements with support providers, and program-specific working capital funds. (The other three are Abrams Tank System, EA-6B Prowler, and F-16 Fighting Falcon.)

    Production Status, Population, and Planned Life

    There are four Guardrail/Common Sensor systems fielded. One GR/CS system is authorized per aerial exploitation battalion in the military intelligence brigade at each corps. A standard system consists of six to twelve RC-12 aircraft that fly operational missions in sets of two or three. Ground processing is conducted in the integrated IPF. Current Guardrail capabilities will be merged with those of the Airborne Reconnaissance Low and evolve into the next generation airborne system, the Aerial Common Sensor (ACS) program, which will begin fielding in 2009 and complete fielding in 2016.

    Prime contractor: Raytheon (Wichita, KS); TRW (Sunnyvale, CA); Systems and Electronics (St. Louis, MO); L3 Communications (Salt Lake City, UT); Lockheed Martin (Owego, NY)

    Office of Primary Responsibility: Project Manager, Aerial Common Sensor (ACS)

    R-TOC Focus Areas: (From USD (AT&L) memorandum dated May 10, 1999)

    1. Reduced demand from weapon systems via reliability and maintainability improvements

    • Development of operational availability requirements for the GR/CS mission and ground equipment.
    • Identify current and future sustainment costs, track these costs, and develop a sustainment engineering program
    • Developing reporting procedures for primary mission equipment and ground station combat capability to mitigate obsolescence.
    • Develop cost reduction initiatives and seek funding via COSSI, TOCR, RM&S, VECP, and other programs.

    2. Reduced supply chain response times, leading to reduced spares, system support footprint, and depot needs

    • Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) will consider all sources of funding and types of programs to reduce spares production.

    3. Competitive sourcing of product support, leading to streamlining and overhead reductions

    • IPTs will reengineer the system to develop alternative sources of supply.
    • Will consider replacement of multiple sustainment contracts with a single CLS contract.

    Performance-based Pilot Activities

    Guardrail is one of four R-TOC Pilot Programs selected in October 2000 to experiment with:

    • Establishment of formal performance agreements between the program managers and their warfighter customers based on warfighter expectations and mission availability, particularly for legacy systems.
    • Use of program-specific formal agreements (or "contracts") with organic providers based on output and availability.
    • Use of a program-specific working capital fund to pool funding sources and provide a robust financial base for the program managers to fund product support providers to meet mission availability expectations.

    The Program provided an update briefing on the status of these efforts at the 8th and 14th R-TOC Forum.

    The Program office generated formal performance agreements between the major using commands (INSCOM, USAREUR, and FORSCOM) and Product Manager, ACS/CECOM, which define the operational availability commitments for Guardrail/Common Sensor equipment and the metrics that will be used to determine success.

    The program also reviewed all current contracts with support providers, including contractors, DLA inventory control points, and depots, to determine performance type and identify which ones are appropriate for performance based contracting. The program is working with the CECOM Acquisition Center to develop future contracts as performance agreements, and is working with the depot to develop sustainment programs.

    The program explored the development of a methodology to prioritize work efforts among stakeholders. The stakeholders would not discuss sharing of funding, which would be a necessary condition for establishing a program WCF. As an alternative, the program is developing a concept for a Life Cycle Management Program IPT, which would involve all GR/CS stakeholders in the identification of performance measures and the establishment of priorities for sustainment and modernization.